Sign in

← All documents

centreville planning commission work session minutes

Minutes June 2, 2021 · 1 page(s)

View original PDF ↗ Meeting

Minutes of the Centreville Planning Commission work session (June 2, 2021) focused on accessory structures. Staff presented proposals to limit accessory building size to 30% of the required rear yard, specific minimum side/rear setbacks by size category, and discussed the definition of “detached,” height-based setbacks, requiring vegetative buffers for structures over 650 sq. ft., and extra setback or tree buffering for steel structures.

Centreville Planning Commissionaccessory structures30% rear yard limitsetbacks by sizedefinition of detachedvegetative buffer (>650 sq ft)steel structure buffering
AI-generated summary — verify against the source document.

Full extracted text

The document's complete text, exactly as extracted — not a summary. Use “Summarize this document” above for the short version.

Centreville Planning Commission
Work Session
June 2,2021
7:00 p.m.
MINUTES
The June 2,202l Centreville Planning Commission work session was called to order at7:06 p.m.by Darren Brown,
Chair, in the Liberly Building, second floor meeting room. The following members and staff were present: Darren
Brown, Chair; Kara Voight, Vice Chair; and Tim Zuella, Member; Tim McCluskey, Town Council President; Steve
Walls, Town Manager; Sharon VanEmburgh, Town Attorney; Chris Jakubiak, Town Planner; and Betty Jean Hall,
Administrative Assistant.
Discussion
a.
Accessory Structures
r
Mr. Jakubiak prepared a power point presentation to review and discuss accessory structures during this
work session.
r
A 1,000 sq. ft. structure sitting just 3 feet from a property line can impose a real burden on a neighboring
property.
o
Mr. Jakubiak's suggestion is to limit the square footage of accessory structures to 30%o of the required
rear yard. The required rear yard is the rear setback times the width of the lot.
.
The definition of 'detached' was questioned. Is a garage detached if connected to a home by a
breezeway?
r
The building must still meet the definition of accessory. An accessory structure is meant to be secondary
and subordinate to the house.
o
Mr. Jakubiak's proposed minimum setback for accessory structures are:
ft. 5'
0 - 200 sq. side: rear: 5'
ft. 7'
200 - 650 sq. side: rear: 5'
ft. 15'
Over 650 sq. side: rear: l0'
o
Mr. McCluskey stated he believes the height of an accessory structure should dictate the setbacks from
the side and rear property lines.
o
Should a vegetative buffer should be required for an accessory structure over 650 sq. ft.?
o
Should the architecture of an accessory structure determine its placement? Any steel structure shall be set
back an additional 5 feet or shall be buffered with an additional row of trees, for example.
Adiournment
The June 2,2021Planning Commission work session adjourned at 8:28 p.m
Respectfully submitted,
{4qk-*il"W
Betty Jean Hall
Administrative Assistant
Page I of 1
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.