centreville planning commission work session minutes
Minutes June 2, 2021 · 1 page(s)
Minutes of the Centreville Planning Commission work session (June 2, 2021) focused on accessory structures. Staff presented proposals to limit accessory building size to 30% of the required rear yard, specific minimum side/rear setbacks by size category, and discussed the definition of “detached,” height-based setbacks, requiring vegetative buffers for structures over 650 sq. ft., and extra setback or tree buffering for steel structures.
Centreville Planning Commissionaccessory structures30% rear yard limitsetbacks by sizedefinition of detachedvegetative buffer (>650 sq ft)steel structure buffering
AI-generated summary — verify against the source document.
Full extracted text
The document's complete text, exactly as extracted — not a summary. Use “Summarize this document” above for the short version.
Centreville Planning Commission
Work Session
June 2,2021
7:00 p.m.
MINUTES
The June 2,202l Centreville Planning Commission work session was called to order at7:06 p.m.by Darren Brown,
Chair, in the Liberly Building, second floor meeting room. The following members and staff were present: Darren
Brown, Chair; Kara Voight, Vice Chair; and Tim Zuella, Member; Tim McCluskey, Town Council President; Steve
Walls, Town Manager; Sharon VanEmburgh, Town Attorney; Chris Jakubiak, Town Planner; and Betty Jean Hall,
Administrative Assistant.
Discussion
a.
Accessory Structures
r
Mr. Jakubiak prepared a power point presentation to review and discuss accessory structures during this
work session.
r
A 1,000 sq. ft. structure sitting just 3 feet from a property line can impose a real burden on a neighboring
property.
o
Mr. Jakubiak's suggestion is to limit the square footage of accessory structures to 30%o of the required
rear yard. The required rear yard is the rear setback times the width of the lot.
.
The definition of 'detached' was questioned. Is a garage detached if connected to a home by a
breezeway?
r
The building must still meet the definition of accessory. An accessory structure is meant to be secondary
and subordinate to the house.
o
Mr. Jakubiak's proposed minimum setback for accessory structures are:
ft. 5'
0 - 200 sq. side: rear: 5'
ft. 7'
200 - 650 sq. side: rear: 5'
ft. 15'
Over 650 sq. side: rear: l0'
o
Mr. McCluskey stated he believes the height of an accessory structure should dictate the setbacks from
the side and rear property lines.
o
Should a vegetative buffer should be required for an accessory structure over 650 sq. ft.?
o
Should the architecture of an accessory structure determine its placement? Any steel structure shall be set
back an additional 5 feet or shall be buffered with an additional row of trees, for example.
Adiournment
The June 2,2021Planning Commission work session adjourned at 8:28 p.m
Respectfully submitted,
{4qk-*il"W
Betty Jean Hall
Administrative Assistant
Page I of 1